You might be talking prosecution for tax avoidance.

Final point on this: we can all think of laws that are in effect that are never prosecuted.  

Fraud implies criminal activity, which Subject-To is not if done correctly.Transferring ownership of a property with a mortgage on it, MAY be a violation of the mortgage contract, but that is not fraud and no one will be prosecuted.

In an extreme case like this, there needs to be prosecution for financial crimes. 

We live in an area where there is a high likelihood that at some point someone who is politically ambitious will do just that and have someone arrested and prosecuted for thumbing their nose at federal law.

I think I would contact the entity who prosecuted him for RE Fraud and ask if there is a victim's compensation fund for the case.

Mortgage fraud prosecution has increased in recent years due to low interest rates on home mortgages which make purchasing homes easier and more attractive, and as the housing market grows, we can expect even more mortgage fraud cases to be brought.

Please say "yes" otherwise you are acting as a real estate agent and are likely to be prosecuted.

If the deed has a Grantor, Grantee, a legal, two witnesses and what looks like a valid notary it's considered good to go.As far as prosecuting, it's up the the local DA. 

Robocallers, ringless voicemailers and spam texters can all take a long walk off a short pier.I hope the FTC starts prosecuting these creeps in earnest.