@Ed WoodThe article paints with a broad brush and draws conclusions that don't apply everywhere.In one county that I deal in, the number of foreclosures at the LAST sale was the most in history!

We don't know enough to jump to conclusions about loan fraud.

In as much, i've come to the conclusion that real-estate investing is probably one of the most solid investing methods to date, and now I have a problem.

Through reading and listening to every podcast on iTunes I have come to the conclusion that it is a good idea for just about anyone to find a way to get access to the MLS.

I do not know where the duplex is located but Heat Pumps do not work well when outside temperatures are in the 30's or lower and with most of the country under an artic freeze I would not jump to conclusions based on his statement.

Update/conclusion: Glad to report that in the end it was relatively painless.

I was quickly coming to that same conclusion.

ed maximum commission.So to me it is speaking to the requirements of the listing agent/Broker in the first two sections so the logical conclusion is that the third is probably similar and is in dealing with the requirements as a result of contact made while acting as a real estate agent.

Of course, your loan officer might be having a bad day or just not like you, and in that case you're spending a couple thousand on legal fees and perhaps losing your property in order to find out whether you've cured the default or not...However, the conclusion that the lender will likely not to pursue a foreclosure if you attempt to solve the DOS default by re-conveying the property is bolstered by the fact that I ran a quick nationwide Westlaw search to see if there were any published opinions on the "curability" issue, and did not find any.

Also, what math do you use to come up with that conclusion?