That is, even at the confiscatory terms most HML's charge (and we're guilty), it’s almost always in the financial interest of a rehabber to borrow the money.Similarly, if your retirement plan is going to partner, and earn 50% of the profit, it will have to pay UBIT at a rate that quickly approaches 39.6% as shown here.

I hope they aren't considering EM as consideration.And while I am not an attorney I am not sure how a C&D can prevent someone from applying for and obtaining a license/certification, I would think that there would be an issue with the presumption of guilt without having been formally investigated, charged and found in violation or guilty.

Odie Ayaga thanks for the advice, I'm already guilty as charged with repeating forum topics... thanks!

You're just looking to ease a guilty conscience!

I am clear up front, they have it in writing, and they can abide by it or suffer the consequences.Calling them with reminders, pleading for them to pay so they can avoid eviction, or any attempt to negotiate with them is a sign of weakness and they'll usually try to take advantage of that.

If that is the case, then you aren't very strong (or feel guilty) about your sale price and profit.  

Even if I were sued, I document everything and obey the law, so I won't be found guilty.

Can someone help me out, as I’m definitely guilty of this many times.

Today I am guilty of pulling homes out of other parks to put into my parks- so I understand the game.

Twenty-four hours is presumed to be a reasonable notice in the absence of evidence to the contrary.(9) Promptly commence an action under Chapter 1923. of the Revised Code, after complying with division (C) of section 5321.17 of the Revised Code, to remove a tenant from particular residential premises, if the tenant fails to vacate the premises within three days after the giving of the notice required by that division and if the landlord has actual knowledge of or has reasonable cause to believe that the tenant, any person in the tenant's household, or any person on the premises with the consent of the tenant previously has or presently is engaged in a violation as described in division (A)(6)(a)(i) of section 1923.02 of the Revised Code, whether or not the tenant or other person has been charged with, has pleaded guilty to or been convicted of, or has been determined to be a delinquent child for an act that, if committed by an adult, would be a violation as described in that division.