
2 May 2018 | 3 replies
If B### E### gave you a binder with the underwriter's signatures, the underwriter is probably going to have to honor the contract (all other things aside that could conflict with that statement).You may have claims against the title company, ### Title Services, even if the agent acted outside the scope.

14 May 2018 | 8 replies
Most are around 5pm on a week night which conflicts with my job.

17 May 2018 | 2 replies
It would strongly depend on which state (for property taxes and insurance) but I might suggest to use a value of $250,000....unless you need conflict in this scene to develop the plot more...then he's DECLINED!

21 July 2017 | 6 replies
Oh well, I just see the potential for conflict.

20 September 2016 | 19 replies
And you especially do not have to be represented by an agent with a conflict of interest!!

3 January 2018 | 3 replies
There is a lot of conflicting information online about this scenario.

5 October 2018 | 7 replies
@Dave Foster has discussed that before.Unfortunately, Alyse, you've got two conflicting goals on this one.1.
10 August 2017 | 7 replies
I was asking some preemptive questions if that answer was "the bank/listing agent" but sounds like that's a "worry about it in the off chance it happens" scenario.You're saying a reputable title company is going to be right often enough that:It probably wouldn't be worth my personal follow up (figuring out the deep/full process, getting second searches, whatever) and I can reasonably "take their word for it"I shouldn't really worry about whatever it is the bank and the listing agent was talking about even though it directly conflicts with the title search and chalk it up god knows what, the title company would be more of the authoritative sourceThere's not much more precautions, planning, or steps I should take since the title came back clean and just assume the risk of something random which is always a riskAnd the original answer is yes, the title insurance should cover something as it comes out but it will still be a pain in the ***

22 July 2020 | 7 replies
The key is that syndications are a conflict of interest business and the manager can "hire" he or she personally to perform work that they'd normally pay a third party to do.

30 January 2019 | 94 replies
The problem lies in the fact that you can not be a wholesaler, and represent the seller at the same time, because those are conflicting goals.