By destroying social security or making it a 401k like program will cause a lot of unintended consequences.And I doubt that 7.65% bump for an individual who is having a hard time paying his/her rent will somehow save them.

I appealed the decision.As I was retaining my attorney my tenant destroyed my property after court causing $855 in water damages by using maxi pads and flushing them down the toilet.

I'm not interested in a property where there's a good chance it eventually gets knocked over  and tourism being destroyed for a while. 

Iv been to court to waste $1500 on a professional tenant who destroyed the unit and Iv paid $500 to get the keys back and the unit in perfect condition in half the time.

We had been going to hotel Lorraine to pay rent and supposedly pay rental ins that later found out after all of our belongings were destroyed due to them not paying gas or water and it blowing all of the radiators in the entire place.

I had renters destroy my property and I'm having trouble finding and understanding where to go for a loan to get it back up and renting. 

In another case, if your handyman breaks a pipe causing water to destroy the kitchen hardwoods, and your policy excluded Water Damage, you would be solely reliant upon his coverage, if any, to pay for the damages.

The planks in the hallway separate the rooms so if carpeting gets destroyed in one room I only have replace it.

Better to keep the place vacant and in good shape then to have a non-paying tenant who is destroying the place nightly.If you put an ad in the paper advertising the place at $1.00 a month you would have a line.

And it will be more painful to have hardwood destroyed after one bad tenant.