data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e47e4/e47e4a65a75c9df90652131d846b5c8e3ec4f098" alt=""
25 March 2015 | 7 replies
Chalk it up to experience, don't punish your agent and move onto the next good deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c9db/7c9dbaa67a93d1d44eb2b8ac1d9656600752619f" alt=""
25 June 2013 | 24 replies
I think it was because they were young and stupid and now that they got punished once, they don't want to have that happen to them again.In all, I'm pretty strict about who I let into one of my properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1f28/f1f2846330f4f4bb16543d8fb7e3213e7c2868c5" alt=""
25 July 2013 | 8 replies
I'm probably a glutton for punishment; I believe I'll enjoy walking that line between keeping a tenant AND owner happy simultaneously.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f7dc/3f7dc77d18d4cbad297a8b02960d3a0050790b6e" alt=""
14 February 2015 | 6 replies
I proceeded to call in every claim possible over that next three months and punished them good.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4633/b46337efbf97b6c0925d0e4eb77e749ca1f55544" alt=""
24 March 2015 | 11 replies
The law treats you differently (punishes you more severely) than that of the unlicensed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b4cf/4b4cfe7752b7e568c66768c0cdc39f6d1fcd8324" alt=""
15 July 2012 | 23 replies
The punishment is up to $10k and is treated as a class 3 felony.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13879/1387948c18fb68463fd0264c50596bf13030e7cc" alt=""
5 July 2012 | 8 replies
The bank cannot keep it and if they do, they should be punished.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff5f8/ff5f8b56ab0d045e2b7d8651bff0bc03656f3c26" alt=""
11 July 2012 | 21 replies
Greg, great article, and makes my point of regulations, you simply can not trust people to do the right thing, you have to force them or make such behavior so punishable that they never even consider doing bad things.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c4d3/6c4d35a49e716cd6a7467290933153c9bbd26856" alt=""
7 August 2014 | 25 replies
Credit score is a function of available credit to usage.The algorithm punishes you for using most of your available credit lines.For example take 10,000 a your credit limit.7,500 or more used really hurts your score, 5,000 or more is neutral, and 3,300 or less helps your score.So 75% hurt,50% is okay, 33% or under helps.If CC's are high you can do a combo of paying some down and also asking for a credit limit increase which will lower your balance to usage ratio and should help your score rise some again.No legal advice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff2f6/ff2f694253cb2c24a2f467a839e12f9c67b3ed7c" alt=""
13 August 2014 | 4 replies
The first thought that came to my mind was that I was being punished for being an investor.2) Is this such a common occurrence that I will only be able to count on a 2% seller contribution for all future negotiations.