There was evidence of some packing having taken place but I didn't see any evidence of anything having been moved out of the house.

On line direct payment with evidence of payment confirmation sent to the seller every month.

My question is this: as I look to maximize that capital and use it to the fullest, I believe the numbers are self evident that if I can purchase two properties with that dollar amount versus one, I can double my ROI.

I'm wary of inheriting a tenant without any evidence of the rental history...

If deferred maintenance repairs are evident there's like more issues "under the hood".

This is straight from the outline from our Fund's acquisition manual that I am writing:Avoiding rent controli.www.nhmc.orgii.City government or local apartment associationiii.Likely in1.Tenant majorities2.Liberal majorities3.Concentration of senior citizens4.Privately-owned, high-rise, apartment buildings5.More than 100 tenants above national median incomeNote that the information above contains useful resources and evidence that the locale is tenant friendly as opposed to landlord friendly.

Also what type of evidence do you need to convince them that you are taking calculated risks?

I can't imagine any judge looking at the evidence and stating he can stay or I have to give him a boat load of money.Thank God he has chilled on the dealing from my home and is starting to keep a lower profile after my last police report.

It is one hell of a stretch to draw that conclusion based on your "evidence".

There is supposedly some process for protesting the appraisal if you feel it was done incorrectly and have evidence to support that contention.