Well, you can guess what happened.Understand this: credit reports and information pulled for mortgage applications are incredibly dangerous should someone intercept this type of information.

If they don't do that, then your argument makes sense because a)the MFH is being penalized because they are not getting credit for residential units, and b)it is generally cheaper for the utility to maintain fewer connections for more people than the other way around.

They have seen the wreckage of 2008 and the danger of over-levereged investors in general.

If you provide a potentially dangerous piece of equipment and the tenant or an invitee is injured using said equipment, you could very well be sued.

If you have 5 or fewer homes trying to get a discount is not always the best idea.   

When you have fewer than 10 properties, it's hard to make that work.I am in a mastermind with about 30 other investors with a wide range of strategies, portfolio size and experience. 

Maybe another 1031 in to fewer buildings or a larger MFH that can support onsite management if it’s enough money.

There are fewer people looking at 5-30 units, so lower competition gives you more opportunities.A larger complex will justify on-site managers and on-site maintenance.

I will NOT ideally stand by as terroristic attempts are made, which is EXACTLY what it is to pump those outlandish bs promotions, to infer people to make financially dangerous and damaging actions from unjustified fear.

What are the potential “dangers” of investing in this type of property or challenges that could be faced?