Allow me to explain something to you.What people call "chest pumping" simply is proving others that are wrong with concrete data showing them they are wrong and why, so they can learn and grow from it.

Originally posted by @Lodewijk Hof:Hello,I'm doing my research on Australia real estate market. ll use the data for a brochure, which is part of my strategy to increase investor awareness.I'm wondering if you can help me on the following data:1.

I'm originally from Kentucky and moved to Palm Beach County to pursue real estate full time.

I too believe that economies of scale will will give us more bang for our buck, but since MTR data is fairly new, it was also difficult to analyze the profit potential for a new 4plex.

This response is a shift from what I originally posted I know- I spent all weekend down the rabbit hole and have clarified my thoughts a bit, which was what I was looking to do when I posted!  

Property was originally listed for $1.2mm this past year they’ve done multiple price decreases to $699k.

You’d be able to pull out $330,455, which is significantly more than your initial $236,930 investment.Your Initial Investment Back: This means that in 5 years, you’ll not only get your original investment back but also keep an additional $93k in your pocket.However, there’s a downside:Negative Cash Flow Impact: Over the next 5 years, due to the negative cash flow of $1,229 per month, your total cumulative loss will be $(60,153).

Your payment may remain about the same as the original deal!

What your deal would ultimately entail is a buyer who trusts you enough to give you $125k and trust you to pay it back while his property is encumbered by both your seller finance note and your original mortgage for $125k.

I was originally thinking about purchasing all four but am so glad I started small with one.