For instance, anywhere where it says being a principle does not make one an owner, or something along those lines.It is unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to engage in or conduct, to advertise or claim to be engaging in or conducting the business, or acting in the capacity of a real estate broker, affiliate broker, time-share salesperson or acquisition agent, as defined in § 62-13-102, within this state, without first obtaining a license as broker, affiliate broker, time-share salesperson or acquisition agent, as provided in this chapter, unless exempted from obtaining a license under § 62-13-104.

If you stay on top of serving the 3 day notice and serve the unlawful detainer quick, usually the tenants leave willing so they don't have an eviction on their record.

At the same moment I was looking at the unlawful detainer record for our county and see 7 evictions in 10 years.

I might start by seeing if the current set-up is harmful or unlawful.

it is unclear to me if you have possession of the house and the tenants have leftIf the tenants have not left, then go thru the unlawful detainer process to obtain possession (other things can also be done)if you have possession, there's no need for a warrant since you are allowing entry

Any suggestions or ideas would be very much appreciated.I also sent a 10 day unlawful detainer certified mail today.

You could get charged with an unlawful, "self help eviction" if you turn the water off. 

If you file the unlawful detainer on your own or have your PM do it, you will not get legal fees, and thus your collection efforts will be  reduced by the attorney's fee.

If they don't pay within three days, we contact our attorney to file for eviction and unlawful detainer with the court.

The Case is now being handle by my lawyer who is recommending to file an unlawful detainer, while the squatters lawyer is arguing that his defendant has rights on the property like compensation, or plain rights to the propertyWhat are your thoughts?