I found these 2 paragraphs particularly intriguing:In a similar vein, the Missouri statute requires you to disclose in writing whether the property was the site “[e]ndangering the welfare of a child” through “physical injury.”

Many insurance carriers are moving toward no aggressive pets as the injuries and ultimate liability claims are a nightmare and ongoing with neighbors/tenants which also makes them costly over time.If the dog is eligible on your current insurance plan and you agree to allow the pet...

There's also the risk of injury to myself which could harm my productivity.Do you have the skills?

Injury lawyers work on contingency, so why would they take on a complicated case where they need to pierce an LLC or where they need to fight to collect a judgment?

I am trying to prevent personal injury issues.

As far as the dog if they say they will pay more see how much more they will pay and most importantly since it is an insurance company are they responsible for any injuries caused by the dog as well as tenant damage. 

The key point to note here is the recent proposals for (i) Payroll Protection Program (PPP) (ii) SBA Economic Disaster Injury Loss (EDIL):(i) PPP loan of 650Bn the Congress vested the discretionary power to Banks under writer and they have given based on the their Clients balance on the line of Credit.

Most likely the state where the property is located is where lawsuits would be brought if they are something for personal injury like a trip and fall or something of that nature because the “cause of action” arose in that state.

To show liability, one must show that the actions of the party against whom judgment is sought are the direct and proximate cause of your injury

Ryan,What a lot of the posts are missing is that, in most states, this is a work related injury.