I'm looking at my deals where I would be getting 50 dollars cash flow and wondering, is this good enough, is it too risky?

I occasionally come across multifamily deals where I work, so I want to check average rent prices in the area to see if its a good enough deal for me to snag myself, but it isn't a constant occurrence where it justifies me paying a subscription you know?

Ignorance or being a rookie is a good enough excuse to ask.

Probably the biggest issue I now see with TK is that unless you find a good enough deal that has built in equity and positive monthly cash flow it could be a risky deal.

If the deal is good enough, you can find an investor to flip that to because they get a rental income with relatively little cash outlay so their cash-on cash return is strong.   

I have a few whole sellers that send me properties here and there but nothing has ever panned out dude to the deal not being good enough for me to flip so I have not done anything with them yet.

And although I agree with the sentiment on this thread 100% to save money when possible, I disagree 1000% saving $997 if the product is actually good enough to save you a few headaches in the long-run.

Others argued their product has stronger interior frames or some other sturdier construction advantages, but WW seemed to be a "good enough" option for properties where you don't expect to own it 20 years from now.

@Jason Arcuri I hear what you're saying, I'm just looking at the overall financial picture of the state of Connecticut, and the fact that the state is bleeding citizens and businesses at an incredible rate, and I have to ask myself how many renters are there going to be when the overall population is trending down rapidly, and the fiscal situation of remaining citizens is either not going to be good, or is going to be good enough that they can buy, not rent.

It depends on the hard money lender and the LTV got to be good enough for little to no money down.