For investors seeking stability, flexibility, and reduced seasonal impact, these states are ideal.

If you can find one with 2 bathrooms that is ideal.

Maybe with plumbing work that's not ideal but for most types of work its fine and they have accepted it, they got paid for the work they did so there were no further disputes.

It is a little lower than I expected but I will be able to sell these off, however, it may be at a loss and is less than what I had mortgaged on these houses so I would probably need to come up with cash at closing, which is not ideal.

It sounds like you want more time, so active investing such as flipping or rehabbing might not be ideal.

Losing $50k through this is not ideal, but I’m fortunate that it is not a painful sum to lose.What I am seeking is advice on how to leave evidence in the public record that could be found by future landlords and limited partners vetting the GP, who’s seeking $8M total / $250k each from accredited investors per facility as he seems to have a plan to move around the country opening facilities.A $57k bill could be a devastating to many landlords, and I want to help prevent them from experiencing a similar situation. 

This is ideal.

I have always heard of the danger of a dual agent situation and understand why it's not ideal.

He was overwhelmed at first with all the "insider" stuff: the 1031 exchanges, cash-on-cash returns, and figuring out what an ideal cap rate is, especially in a hot market like Dallas.

I've seen a few different partnership structures, but what do you see as ideal?