Currently I am thinking of splitting 70% of cashflow with investors proportional to their investment.

We will pay no more for loss of, or damage to that property than the proportion that the Limit of Insurance under this Coverage Part for the property bears to the Agreed Value shown for it in the Declarations.b.

Pittsburgh does not receive enough investor activity in proportion to how many opportunities are available.

You can often increase rents by smaller proportions each year, even if that pushes your rent slightly above market rates, because there is a huge inconvenience factor to moving.

GO CELEBRATE EMOTIONS WHEN YOU SCORE THE BIG PROFIT AT THE END OF SALE OR REFI AT THE BAR etc etc lol.The bank will go lower, they always will go lower.Banks are down right retarded about money when it comes to an REO - they make bad choices financially from our perspective looking in, but that is what creates opportunity for people like us.A good deal......... depends on the ARV and trends in that area (comps) I don't know any markets in Illinois but nationally in compact areas if you can still get it bought 25-30% below the comps then that seems to be good.

We will split the cash-flow in the same proportion - 75/25.

The sale of one of the parcels would only trigger the proportional gains allocated to that one property. 

There might be some commercial default but not this massive wave of epic proportions like people are thinking.The "troubled loans" as they were called run through about 2018 or so.

Maybe you can share in a separate thread how you manage to have your profits be inversely proportional to real estate prices?

Is that a realistic proportion?