data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48023/48023a8e693b09e05541778ed56987fe9988abb9" alt=""
2 September 2023 | 3 replies
If you think that you would be able to use the cash from that refi to go and BRRRR one or two more properties this year then I would take the hit on the rate as long as you are close to breaking even on the cash flow side and/or can maintain being in a minor deficit for this time period, which it sounds like you can.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59a17/59a17fa426651a96ae24f86ef3e586d09009e90a" alt=""
8 August 2023 | 10 replies
In other words, they are the ones breaking banks, but they will also be the first to blame bankers for the woes that they and our own government with runaway deficit spending are the real culprits.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89313/89313a4d38fa400cdd1a40b955f94ccef92df22f" alt=""
27 February 2019 | 7 replies
I am in the parking sector, and simply put, as long as there is a deficit in parking in the area it should be a no brainer!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70a9f/70a9fe4d64f14a87a91d0010c71ddc1478e55de6" alt=""
29 July 2023 | 6 replies
We are wondering if it would be better to just off-load the property now at a ~85K loss, or hold onto the property while accruing large annual deficits in hopes that the property will appreciate back to our purchase price in the future.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/210d6/210d6af9c96a95db748d57be4321cd689039c506" alt=""
14 June 2020 | 28 replies
That's because it doesn't take many years of strong rent growth to overcome the initial deficit, and then in each future year you continue to outperform.This strategy often appeals to investors with very long investment horizons.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c931/9c93137984cf942463213e3b826274f31814aa22" alt=""
7 December 2018 | 37 replies
As far as the argument for taxes being historically low and paying now vs later when they could be higher is very valid, however if you want to play the what if game, do you think there could be a point where the govt takes away the tax free status of roth accounts due to the deficit or social security that's run out of funding?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00600/006004f753e4d82cc7c952de5ce5672a3e04abbf" alt=""
8 April 2018 | 15 replies
Unfortunately thats going to be yet another contributor to how ridiculous the deficit is going to grow over the next few years.Its funny how these same politicians were so up in arms but a few years ago about how critical it was to get the deficit under control.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc558/bc5584f41c892a877c65e6c3c3efde0c6e3978d9" alt=""
8 May 2018 | 11 replies
Talk to a real estate lawyer about deficit capital restoration obligation to see if that is what you are looking for.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0838/f08386bc834d28b37a5aec79d49c159d20c8b761" alt=""
11 July 2022 | 17 replies
The appreciation factor is a fact, rents raising is as certain as the sun rising in the east, there is a more then 6 million unit deficit, that's not going to change or evaporate any time soon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17177/171776a2185e38df6129e7ac11337ff028d19a65" alt=""
21 September 2023 | 4 replies
Hospitals have not been paid for all the covid stuff yet, running at deficits.