Or are there so many false assumptions in my logic that my argument is a pile of dookie?

The assumption is dumb Californians are overpaying and get roped into false narratives with the bp TK marketers. 

I have buddies working at CBRE and JLL and they all say that the "scraps" are on loopnet, properties that don't sell with bad/false cap rates.  

My biggest concern for most "wholesalers" is the making of promises under false pretenses.

Just do not get trapped by the false sense of security people think that a job provides.If this economic downturn has taught me anything, it was that most of my income was from active streams, and I did not give it much thought until it was almost too late!

Pros- Your attoney may clear an issue that others have had problems with, say to partition owners or cure a survey issue and thereby making the property more marketable perhaps more valuable.Cons-you may not get your way, bringing false claims is a good way to become liable for costs, expenses and damages to others.I suggest you be aware that title issues can be cured and that before you bet on the success of obtaining Quiet Title you seek legal advice before you buy a property or add to any existing complications.

These people are able to overcome fear, which Scott notes as “False Evidence Appearing Real.”

The statement is absurd if you know how the tax system works.

We do let people know that providing false information on their application will automatically disqualify them.

This statement is false.