If the building has 4 units or less and the owner lives in one of the units.If the property is a SFH and the owner owns less than 3 SFH's.If the animal brings an undue financial hardship to the building owner.If the animal would cause damages or harm to others in the building."

That said, there is probably no harm in reiterating this policy here.I agree that specifying a NEMA rating for the EVSE if it is outside is probably a good idea. 

Otherwise, if you are a true seller, what is the harm and effort involved in giving details of a property or note before seeing a POF?

Then there is no harm, no foul.

Further, the government is essentially telling people to not go out and shop, which continues harm to these businesses (while helping the public health).

There needs to be mechanisms to be able update a property and raise its rent to market that isn’t overly harmful to tenants or landlords, and then you’d have a good functioning market.I agree its not a bad thing, but it isn't a good thing either.

I see this as a loss to the community and harmful to lower-income residents.As an alternative, I have been trying to do what I call "Value Builds".

An experienced investor who is well-capitalized can deal with the issue and continue making payments, without harming the seller or their credit.

If you make it seem like you are helping someone, or if you try to help but harm them, or if you get their equity by buying it from them under market, you might be put into the crosshairs of a district attorney for portraying yourself as a foreclosure consultant.

If what you say is malicious and untrue, with intent to harm, then of course it's a libel.