In both cases, they don't know what they don't know, a dangerous place to make such noble assumptions.

The summary is that the claims of more of fewer guns or more or less gun control doesn't really matter much.The article explores what happened in England after the strict gun control laws were enacted and calls out how criminals DON'T follow the laws.Summarily dismissing the effectiveness of guards by exploring 1-2 episodes doesn't seem fair to me.

Some companies, like North State Bancorp in Raleigh, have taken the opportunity to deregister their stock because they have fewer than the limit (1,200 in the case of a bank or a bank holding company) holders of record.

Or is cutting out the middleman normally a dangerous proposition?

I have started trying to get the better renters by buying nicer houses with lower cash returns so I have to deal with fewer problems.

There is a huge temptation to buy a property worth well over a half a million dollars and no money down, but there is a huge danger as well.

I wouldn't say it's too dangerous or a war zone, but you need good property management and maintenance.

@Sib BahjatWhile you are correct that some potential renters do check the sexual predators list, it is important to know that most of those listed are not a danger.

Another buyer would want to buy it straight out from you, so you couldn't do seller financing (well, you could - but it gets really messy real quick and dangerous for the guy who sold to you.)

If the underlayment is screwed down and glued, well it can get expensive, dusty, and down right dangerous.