Only insure to mitigate financial risks that would seriously harm you financially on the off-chance they occur (catastrophic health insurance, home insurance, and, for most, auto insurance).Regular repairs and replacement of items covered via home warranties should not seriously harm someone financially; if they do, you do not need to purchase the property.

If anything by responding to your self-serving posts I've given you a platform to spread your bad ideas rather than shut you down.Honestly, you're harming your brand with every reply.

Eventually we changed the system to one that we believed to be more fair and even, but unfortunately, in evaluating the system and your reaction to it, we realized that perhaps the system was doing more harm than good.Many of our users felt that 'influence' wasn't an accurate measure of their actual influence on the site, and sadly, some of our power users were turned off and cut their participation here. -- (emphasis mine - JP)While I'll argue that the system always did what it was designed to do -- measure those people who at any point in time were making the most impact on the site -- I'm also willing to accept that the system was never perfect by any means.Your post gave me one of those full circle moments.

It shouldn't really depend on the specific deal, so there's no harm in doing it now.

If nothing is said to you by your employer and the loan closes, "no harm no foul".

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottbeyer/2015/04/24/how-ironic-americas-rent-controlled-cities-are-its-least-affordable/irony least affordable citieshttps://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/02/rent-control-policy-likely-fueled-the-gentrification-of-san-francisco-study-finds/https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-18/yup-rent-control-does-more-harm-than-goodhttps://web.stanford.edu/~diamondr/DMQ.pdfstandford studyhttps://mises.org/library/unintended-consequences-rent-controlBombing and rent controlhttps://mises.org/wire/rent-control-makes-good-politics-and-bad-economicsGood politics bad economicsNYTimeshttp://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/30/opinion/how-rent-control-hurts-the-poor.html

It has almost no substance.

You know a lot of individuals don’t understand what issues can come of abandoned homes but we’re talking innocent children getting harmed, etc. thank you you so much... your response was exactly what I was thinking but didn’t quite know how to say it Originally posted by @Llewelyn A.

Their worry was the prior owner would do something harmful to the property that would cause a possible acceleration of the property.