(He did note he was having someone go back and research anyone I may have referred and they will make it right if the credits were not applied - I may have been paid on all of them and the others may have as well....what I was upset about was the multiple follow ups required to get them applied so I didn't look like a fool on my side for referring someone)Secondly he apologized for not having someone get back to me and they should have locked in the old rate for as long as I'd been with them.  

I don’t know where in PA the property is located - you should find out whether the specific jurisdiction has any specific rules (although, for the death of me, I can’t imagine some bureaucrat specifying that one must be “in arrears” vs being “late,” which would void your Notice.) about Notice to Quit.Here is the state law:http://codes.findlaw.com/pa/title-68-ps-real-and-personal-property/pa-st-sect-68-250-501.htmlI don’t know what else you wrote in your Notice (or from where you obtained it,) but imagine that if your tenant is upset over the one word vs the other, your form may actually be just fine.Tell them you’ll see their arrears in court, later.

I wouldn't be upset if the numbers made it so it was like i never bought this place to begin with. 

The seller was not happy, the funniest part was the seller was upset even though the whole thing was a result of them misstating expenses.  

Then drop it a few dollars so no one can get upset that I’m overcharging them.

One of them texted me a copy of the letter left by this man and I could see why they were upset.

Having the units full will make it harder to show and may even upset your current tenants.

You should check your contract (if you have a buyers agreement with him) to make sure he is NOT due commissions on anything you buy.Fairly standard language for a retail client but something you should make sure is NOT there as an investor.Assuming no slippery slope there if you aren't using his time and services there is really no reason for him to be upset you are doing your own thing too.

Hey Austin, I know you're mainly upset with the way he handled himself and that blows.

There really isn't any external limit or law for the number of properties that banks can lend on for an individual but regulators keep pressure on them to minimize their risks so the banks end up setting internal limits.