Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

7
Posts
3
Votes
Dee Malkerneker
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
3
Votes |
7
Posts

Frustrations with Seller Inaccuracies

Dee Malkerneker
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
Posted
I’m currently evaluating my second multifamily property and have discovered major inaccuracies from the seller provided material. With the first property the seller provided rent rolls showing 100% current occupancy and stated 95% average for past year. When I did the walk through the actual occupancy was 85% and by examination of the leases and the condition of the property that’s what it clearly averages. To get the same cap rate the purchase price would have been about 400k lower so the deal was a no go. The second property the seller originally stated the flood insurance was 6k less that what it really is. This plus other under reporting of expenses would mandate about a 300 k drop in price to get the agreed upon cap rate at purchase. While I’m glad I caught this stuff during due diligence it’s beyond frustrating. It’s a waste of everyone’s time and initial lawyer fees (for purchase contract). Is anyone else encountering this? How do you avoid it? Are people able to obtain schedule Es ect prior to due diligence?

Loading replies...