I am showing you this because every smelly guru will sell you on their opinion but no one shows concrete evidence of what they are regurgitating actually reliably works.He has a simple website and applied everything I teach right here in the free forums of BP and there you go:https://www.christianbuyshousesingeorgia.com/This is his website BTW.Now, Listen carefully.

The building is 60+ years old, in which there is no evidence of visible mold, no mildew smell.

Not one thing that I started is false or a lie as you accuse without any evidence. 

Otherwise, the criminal case can serve as evidence in suing them in small claims court. 

There are a number of restrictions to be aware of that were not evident until we actually took a homeowner through the process, saw the documents required etc.

Make sure evidence is preserved, like status of smoke detectors. 

If you told him you have been playing pickup games for the past year and need help improving your jump shot, now he has evidence you're motivated and a specific goal he can quickly help you work towards.

Instead of just repeating yourself with statements like "it is illegal" and "look it up" and "it's a fact" why don't you try supporting your argument with evidence?? 

Here's a possibility: prior to the hammer, owner sold the property (actual cure) or provided evidence of an upcoming settlement and lender agreed to it (enforceable promise to cure)

But that fact that every agent I know always starts at 6% seems a bit odd, and for the brief period I was a licensed agent, the fact that my brokerage based their commission splits and amounts due on the 6% commission (even if I negotiated a lower split with my clients) pretty much proves the case and the reason it was settled is because the NAR knows there was countless evidence to show a broad collusion.But, I think it is about time that buyers pay for their own representatives.