Details and attributes aside, this property has been listed on the market for over a year.

Fraudulent inducement claimA claim for fraudulent or intentional misrepresentation requires a showing of the following elements:(1)There must be a representation.(2)That representation must be false.(3)It must have to do with a past or present fact.(4)That fact must be material.(5)It must be susceptible of knowledge.(6)The representer must know it to be false or, in the alternative, must assert it as of his own knowledge without knowing whether it is true or false.(7)The representer must intend to have the other person induced to act or justified in acting upon it.(8)That person must be so induced to act or so justified in acting.(9)That person’s action must be in reliance upon the representation.(10)That person must suffer damage.(11)That damage must be attributable to the misrepresentation, that is, the statement must be the proximate cause of the injuryNave v.

It always amazes me when I ask other brokers/agents WHO if you could create it would be your ideal client and then list the attributes.

But I think you're overplaying it's attributes and attempting to minimize the Bay Area's influence.

Although John qualifies for the capital gain exclusion because he used the home as his primary residence for 2 of the past 5 years, 50% of that gain does not qualify for the exclusion because 2 of the 4 years of ownership were attributable to non-qualified use.

@David Fields I empathize with because I too have similar attributes to yourself.

Any interest on a loan that is attributable to your investment in the property is also deductible.

A portion of the gain is attributable to depreciation.

The reason you want to approach it this way is that if the gain attributed to your primary side is less than $250K you cannot take any overage and apply it to the other side.  

This could be attributed to the baby boomers turning to snowbirds, and retiring in the warmer areas.