If you were ever to sell the 1031 property (the one converted to a primary residence) with deferred gain that traces back to the original California property exchanged for it they might try to assert taxing jurisdiction. 

As one of my strategies, I wholesale, and most of the deals I get under contract are such that most Realtors won't touch them or the seller doesn't want to deal with an agent.Banks and mortgage companies sell (Wholesale) mortgages all the time and the phony ethics police are hidden in the tall grass and then crawl out from under their rock to decry wholesaling.One of the specious arguments asserted by the phony ethics police is that because the wholesalers can't purchase the house themselves they shouldn't enter into a contract or that if they can't find a cash buyer that won't be able to purchase the house and therefore should not enter into an agreement with the seller.This is frankly a week argument.

In a YouTube video released over the weekend to coincide with the home’s listing, Star details the reasons for selling, denying his critics’ assertions that the move from California to Wyoming is simply all about the tax benefits for his businesses, as has been the online chatter.

My reply to your assertion that not everyone qualifies did not dispute that fact and was not intended to be a confrontational post...

This asserts that all the lease information is correct. 

I'm a new landlord and I'm not sure how assertive I should be as a landlord.

From a tax advantage perspective, I wouldn't use any CA corp out of state since CA FTB will try to assert that any income that flows through your corp will be CA income and they will want a piece.

Plus we didn't have worldwide telecom infrastructure and later the internet that would facilitate outsourcing, so the labor market was more able to unionize and assert itself. 

What you asserted is not the law.

Sounds like your PM either has a week Lease that doesn't give him repair access, or he needs to be more assertive in enforcing it.