@James McGovernWe do not use one, not sure what benefit it would have except for slowing down or delaying an evictionMost arbitration hearings are also non binding

Also, the state of formation is likely where internal disputes would be brought among LLC members, so if you and a partner and/or spouse live in CA, you probably want to arbitrate in CA if the two of you had a disagreement.

While the terms of a legal agreement may be enforceable - they are generally only enforceable thru a court of law or perhaps arbitration.

Couple divorced, but this one we had to foreclose on, got it back & immediately sold it to a fellow investor for 2x our total cost (including all legal fees etc) & hold it 12%, 20 yr term.Then we took the foreclosing attorney to arbitration for padding his fees & won a 50% reduction.life goes on...just rinse & repeat!!!

Courts will just arbitrate especially with De'Blasio and you'll waste a lot of time and money on an attorney. 

Also, the state of formation is likely where internal disputes would be brought among LLC members, so if you and a partner live in CA, you probably want to arbitrate in CA if the two of you had a disagreement.

There is typically arbitration clauses and property disclosures to prevent deceptive practices. 

Anyone ever use arbitration clauses in leases as a legal mechanism to prevent tenants from filing complaints against a landlord and to shift some of the legal costs to them?

Not until there is a problem do you bring in attorneys, and principles usually sign arbitration agreements in the offer anyway that prevent anything more than small claims court.

Also, the state of formation is likely where internal disputes would be brought among LLC members, so if you and a partner live in CA, you probably want to arbitrate in CA if the two of you had a disagreement.