As a company we are considering a third party that offers virtual/face time walk thru's where human engagement occurs from the first phone call, until 11pm, weekends, holidays included- where the prospective tenant is loosely (virtually) tethered all the way through showings, feedback, follow ups and ultimately application process.

Hopefully they have that sense and the blame isn’t being deflected on other parties.

Quote from @Moises Salazar: Seller financing is a negotiation and can be anything the two parties agree to.

If you are seeking an actual private lender or direct HML (as opposed to a third party broker) for an investment property transaction (not a consumer loan), there are numerous ways to identify them... consider starting your search here: https://aaplonline.com

It's a tough situation for all parties involved.

They do offer linked accounts, so maybe I'll go with a 3rd party bank that I can trust.I appreciate this concern, as we’re also looking to move to a bank that allows for multiple account to use David Richter’s Profit First method.

@Marc ChaleIf they want to clear it up- why get a third party collector - compute what they owe and send it to them.

The only time I charge a tenant for a service call is if the tenant schedules a service call with one of my 3rd party vendors (that schedules directly with the tenant at my request) and then either no-shows or doesn't allow the vendor to enter as agreed.

Divorces are not usually amicable so trying to get another party to agree to make money on the house (and move you out) will be time consuming and very unlikely.This statement though, "it is just sitting due to interest rates", is troubling.

Your parents and you could probably use a really good Elder law atty in NY as well to look at how best to structure their ownership and passing to you.Nothing wrong with selling to a related party and completing a 1031 exchange.