If you put it out there asking for a 3-5 year lease with a small business or startup in your mind, but H&R Block or Supercuts comes along asking for a 10 year NNN (& it's corporate) and agrees to the rent amount you requested, there's no reason not to entertain that, you got better than what you were expecting (there's a reason NNN properties, or ones with a few NNN tenants sprinkled in that are national chains, often sell for lower cap rates), it's not like taxes or hair cuts are going obsolete any time soon. 

Lastly, as @Arn Cenedella, reach out to some of the large corporations in your area to see if they need executive housing. 

for my rental property which is vacant right now, i see requests coming for a year lease for corporate lease or for AirBnB-ing... 

No income means no taxes to pay.If I used a C-Corp or S-Corp to lend to me, then there are specific rules that require those entities to charge a minimum amount of interest.  

And even pierce the LLC or Corporate veil to make the principals of this transaction be held liable. 

So the question is whether this setup can be pierced by the corporate veil during a lawsuit.

They will usually never own up to these facts - instead they will use the cover of "our corporate clients", etc - it's a big tell!  

Search these very forums for info on this, but you will find that LLCs and Corporations are not what they're hyped up to be.

You're killing me here man.This thread is about a proposal that would discourage corporate landlords from raising rent by more than 5%/yr by reducing their federal tax breaks if they do it.It's not my fault if you didn't read the actual proposal nor the other half of the OP that specifically mentioned the tax breaks being what is tied to the rent increase limit.You can't separate them. 

Sometimes big corporations have a tendency to keep certain projects on life support and not really moving forward.They don't want to scrap it but haven't been presented with a plan or motivation to improve and move it forward.