Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Results (3,078+)
Nicholas Aiola Ask me (a CPA) anything about taxes relating to real estate
12 February 2026 | 2064 replies
Here is a simple example just to illustrate:- Invest in Syndication 1 in Year 1 for $100,000, realize $60,000 depreciation- Invest in Syndication 2 in Year 2 for $100,000, realize $50,000 depreciationThere are typically distributions that would use up some of the depreciation losses, but ignoring them here for simplicity (I have many deals that have created a lot of losses).- Syndication 1 exits in Year 3 for $150,000.
Will Stewart Experience with DSCR loans
11 December 2025 | 11 replies
I've included an example below to help illustrate this.So different lenders have different rates (which do vary even for DSCR loans) but these are factors they all consider.See example below:DSCR < 1Principal + Interest = $1,700Taxes = $350, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $50Total PITIA = $2200Rent = $2000DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2000/2200 = 0.91Since the DSCR is 0.91, we know the expenses are greater than the income of the property.DSCR >1Principal + Interest = $1,500Taxes = $250, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $25Total PITIA = $1875 Rent = $2300DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2300/1875 = 1.23If a purchase, you also generally need reserves / savings to show you have 3-6 month payments of PITIA (principal / interest (mortgage payment), property taxes and insurance and HOA (if applicable).
Samuel Choi Ower finance offer benefits of owner fin
6 December 2025 | 27 replies
Three percent isn’t a rule, it’s just one specific example someone used to illustrate the structure.Second, you’re not “joined at the hip” with the buyer.
Don Konipol Good Deals are Often Complicated
4 December 2025 | 13 replies
Here’s a successful one that recently wound up that illustrates that we need to move beyond the simple to structure deals with maximum wealth building. 5 + years ago I came across a property with 2 retail/warehouse buildings.  
Elmer Wayne Fisher Best scource of income
2 December 2025 | 2 replies
I've included an example below to help illustrate this.So different lenders have different rates (which do vary even for DSCR loans) but these are factors they all consider.See example below:DSCR < 1Principal + Interest = $1,700Taxes = $350, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $50Total PITIA = $2200Rent = $2000DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2000/2200 = 0.91Since the DSCR is 0.91, we know the expenses are greater than the income of the property.DSCR >1Principal + Interest = $1,500Taxes = $250, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $25Total PITIA = $1875 Rent = $2300DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2300/1875 = 1.23If a purchase, you also generally need reserves / savings to show you have 3-6 month payments of PITIA (principal / interest (mortgage payment), property taxes and insurance and HOA (if applicable).
Audrey C. Property Manager Fee structure
4 December 2025 | 13 replies
To try to illustrate better, in theory at leastProperty 1 pays $250 a month and then on average $50 a month in the 20% markups, totaling $300 for the monthProperty 2 pays $250 a month and then on average $150 a month in 20% markups, totaling $400 for the monthThats $700 total for the month In the scenario where they don't charge the markups but instead charge a higher price to achieve the same revenue:Property 1 pays $350 flat Property 2 pays $350 flatSo in theory, property 1 is paying $50 more because the company needs to hit their revenue for doing the work of maintenance for both properties. 
Luke Mertz MHP For Dummies
26 November 2025 | 4 replies
This illustrates compound growth.  
Alan Asriants Most investors don't understand that depreciation is owed back when you sell!
26 November 2025 | 43 replies
The process we follow is illustrated below.Summarizing the illustration: Once the relinquished property is under contract and all contingencies have passed, place the replacement properties under contract—but don't close on them until after the relinquished property closes.
Lesley Resnick Are DSCR rates down due to fed lowering rates? What rates are people seeing?
18 November 2025 | 26 replies
I've included an example below to help illustrate this.So different lenders have different rates (which do vary even for DSCR loans) but these are factors they all consider.See example below:DSCR < 1Principal + Interest = $1,700Taxes = $350, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $50Total PITIA = $2200Rent = $2000DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2000/2200 = 0.91Since the DSCR is 0.91, we know the expenses are greater than the income of the property.DSCR >1Principal + Interest = $1,500Taxes = $250, Insurance = $100, Association Dues = $25Total PITIA = $1875 Rent = $2300DSCR = Rent/PITIA = 2300/1875 = 1.23If a purchase, you also generally need reserves / savings to show you have 3-6 month payments of PITIA (principal / interest (mortgage payment), property taxes and insurance and HOA (if applicable).
Michael Guido Anyone hear of Vestright land deals
23 November 2025 | 55 replies
A recent deal closing of ours will, I believe, illustrate this well: We put together a land deal that closed recently.