The real property investment can be repositioned if it proves disappointing in its original form; it can be refinanced or recapitalized if it has too much or too e pensive debt; inflation over time bales out many bad purchases, and finally the investors knowledge, experience and abilities can be leveraged to turn around a cash flow negative property.I’ll provide an exampleThree years ago we purchased a note from a bank secured by two auto repair facilities with a large amount of excess land.  

It's actually Excel-Easy.

Without evidence, it's hard to say.First, you should educate all of your tenants to report excessive noise to the police.

Interesting to hear that they are claiming that a lender sold all of their loans and kept the excess funds.

Maybe deal with an actual insurance company then maybe you will change your perspective toward Airbnb haha..

so he has an initial negative equity in excess of $100k.so -$100k / (a very small cash flow when properly allocating for expenses and vacancy) equals years before there is any cash flow.  

A market like Boston has a long track record of appreciation in excess of inflation/cpi.  

Rent control in the bay area can be extreme as many areas have rent control in excess of the state mandated rent controlIn general experience RE investors are not choosing to add a single ADU in single family zoned areas.  

We will quickly correct the excess spending, and fill the vacant units with quality residents.

I'm currently pre-approved but my lender gave me a "mid-level rate" which I believe isn't my actual rate since I haven't chosen a property but me not being as educated on the behalf and thinking it was my actual rate I decided to rate shop a bit.