And by scale, you can hold more money back knowing that some assets may need an injection from the cash flow of other assets.  

And blackrock is leading purchase of their loan :-) LOL LOL So blackrock maybe buying with 30% discount ;-) again, consolidation by Blackrock and JP morgan- rather than going to TARP 2.0 , the gov. would just ask JPM to purchase those banks and Fed would inject free liquidity.- 8% years from now, everything is owned by Blackrock and JP Morgan.

the property with the most 3-5 year stuff should be on your short list to sell now if you're cash-strapped and you can at least cut your loss without having to inject more cash. 

Yes, injecting a lot of out-of-state/foreign capital is great and certainly will help boost the economy.

We can then look at renovations in regard to minimum injection to yield the fastest ARV/ROI.

I know you can convert a traditional IRA to Roth by just paying tax on the amount converted, but no other ways to inject more money in there.

Having a signed agreement for each property stating responsibilities and budget, along with the agreement if we go over the budget, we're both responsible for 50% of excess capitol injection. 

If you're doing that correctly injecting $60k of your own $$$ into the property makes no sense financially.

I've never asked or seen anyone that injected themselves in the middle of a PM and investor as you did.

Maybe you can personally inject the $89,000 into the project even though it is not in the budget.