Finally, there is substantial evidence that green buildings, LEED certified in particular, rent for more and go unoccupied much less often.

Evidently there is actually no minimum downpayment from what I understand.

Consider the following...The tenants had:No evidence to support their claim (in fact....just the opposite.

Twenty-four hours is presumed to be a reasonable notice in the absence of evidence to the contrary.(9) Promptly commence an action under Chapter 1923. of the Revised Code, after complying with division (C) of section 5321.17 of the Revised Code, to remove a tenant from particular residential premises, if the tenant fails to vacate the premises within three days after the giving of the notice required by that division and if the landlord has actual knowledge of or has reasonable cause to believe that the tenant, any person in the tenant's household, or any person on the premises with the consent of the tenant previously has or presently is engaged in a violation as described in division (A)(6)(a)(i) of section 1923.02 of the Revised Code, whether or not the tenant or other person has been charged with, has pleaded guilty to or been convicted of, or has been determined to be a delinquent child for an act that, if committed by an adult, would be a violation as described in that division.

We are still few months away from lease expiration and I'm collecting evidence to build a strong eviction case.Whatwould you do if you were in this scenario?

My question is, if I have my lawyer submit a written notice tomorrow (on the 10 day deadline) claiming that I as the purchase inspected the property within the 5 day requirement from the acceptance date, can I then use an official inspection report that was provided on the 10th day as my supporting evidence,  even though the “official” inspection took place after the 5 day deadline?

I happen to be aware of a party doing wrong, but I was not harmed by that party - and I am happy to disclose this to all who ask (as many members have already asked and seen the public evidence).So, with those trader and heat models, only the parties to the transactions can offer feedback - you would end up excluding the type of info that I have, which although it is third party it is very much recorded in public records and should be part of anybody's due diligence regarding that party who has done wrong.I realize it might be too challenging to work this in ...

The short answer it depends on the interpretation of the auditor or the regional SDIRA IRS auditor whether there is evidence of self-dealing.

States adopted false lien statutes to address these issues and attempts to evade creditors.Now, if a lien is filed, slike a second mortgage, you'll also need a note and likely a past payment history or supporting evidence that the lien is valid if made with an individual or if creditors or suits arise seek assets.

I am trying to point out what seems to be evident is that you need to take some time and become versed in administrative and managerial side of investing and raising capital.