data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/057a5/057a51870a3bb8fcde925d1ab10bf11d4a7ef389" alt=""
28 January 2025 | 27 replies
Section 8 would tend to carry higher repair and as a result, additional vacancy.OP’s definition of cash flow is rent minus piti.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fde66/fde66c42acd9fe9f087e4b158ef325e772691d57" alt=""
2 February 2025 | 10 replies
Hi we have been approached to rent out our 4BR/2BA residential home to a group home for at risk youth.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/addf3/addf3df3bfa659d0c33a47604ac39bb7308a9aa8" alt=""
31 January 2025 | 22 replies
This risk is amplified the less money you have attached to the deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f85e/1f85eb473677fd8b350827bd833a3fad74ff3e83" alt=""
5 February 2025 | 6 replies
I would never ever let tenants go alone.. risk of theft and getting your property stripped or worse sqauatter is just far to great.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d453/1d453e43fad2ce3fb90822ec3789141df95c8a2d" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 10 replies
Even trusting a brand new GC who's licensed/"qualified" is a risk from out of state, let alone out of country.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c31e/6c31ee25d7b8f44bcd26315ad654701acdc5563a" alt=""
15 February 2025 | 21 replies
Bottom line, you have to decide how badly you want to own the place, and how much financial cushion you have, and how much risk you are willing to take.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97961/97961a37b535c101fc2d64ab7c4ffc30bcf67ab1" alt=""
3 February 2025 | 31 replies
To me the most frequent issue I see in posts and discussions is not discussing how to scale and also Risk adjusted returns.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbb56/bbb5656d6cea7102b7245e3db232afb23faa7443" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 12 replies
Bigger deals can be a good angle to attack AND that being said there is a greater deal of risk involved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdf32/bdf3272cbc81a97b3c20ef7465668c515cbb271c" alt=""
23 January 2025 | 3 replies
Speak with lenders - and consider that although they might agree they could lend to you today - they might not be able to when you need the loan.Unless the existing debt has no due-on-sale provision, there will always be a risk of the underlying loan being called.If it were to be called due:1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f203/6f2039e8636ecc5b864e287321ea6b0155db0039" alt=""
1 February 2025 | 0 replies
Here are five dangerous provisions to watch for in an Operating Agreement:Dangerous Provisions to Watch:Authority to incur debt without investor approvalPower to make loans to other entities/projectsAbility to cross-collateralize with other propertiesPermission to use investor capital for other venturesCommingling of funds across different projectsWhy These Are Potential Ponzi Indicators:• New investor funds could be used to pay existing investors• Project-to-project lending can mask poor performance• Cross-collateralization puts your investment at risk for others' failures• Commingling enables masking of financial problems• Lack of project segregation enables fraudulent schemesProtective Measures to Look For:Strict single-purpose entity requirementsProject-specific bank accountsDebt limitations and investor approval requirementsProhibited related-party lendingClear fund segregation requirementsProfessional Best Practice:Request bank statements showing separate accounts for each project.