The proposed HUD Rules interpreting the federal SAFE mortgage act can be viewed at www.regulations.gov Use the search parameter "HUD" and the keyword "safe".

You've confirmed what I'd interpreted in my research.  

Sorry that you were disappointed in your interpretation.

But as I read the highlighted sections above, I'm seeing two different interpretations; 1) anyone that has a right to the property and was not notified [33.54(b)] is not bound by ANY limitations period, 2) anyone that falls into the first interpretation actually has a 2 year limitation [34.08(c)].

I will forewarn you they are written in a lot of legal language, so it can be difficult to interpret. 

.: This honestly seems like an awful way to be a host.Your guest has problems so you say 'well here's the door buddy, if you leave, i'll refund you for the nights you don't stay, otherwise, shut up and deal with the problems and we wont pay you a dime'No, it doesn't say that.....it says exactly what it says, not what you want to interpret.

If I am interpreting your question correctly, the tenant portion and the Section 8 subsidy portion are both added together and reported as your rental income.

I also don’t know how the heck you would interpret Joe as insulting you when you didn’t even contribute until after his comment?

however there is a reason states are cracking down on it  ( at least un licensed actiivty)I mean just read the regs in virtually any state.A license is required if for compensation you are bringing a buyer and seller together.. of course there is all sorts of interpretations on this.  

I think these terms are open for interpretation in that some people estimate different values for vacancy and repairs etc. when calculating these numbers.