I agree with @Mario Dattilo and Roger D Jones.I think the only thing that I would draw emphasis on is what Mario said because unless it has a separate tax ID number it is not an apples-to-apples comparable.

The profit shown is pre-tax, given my tax bracket and my investor's could be different, just makes it easier to compare projects apples-to-apples. 

Because some of these bad apples causes trouble doesn't mean we should turn our backs on the community as a whole.

I believe we have underwriters in this forum - just wondering how underwriters analyse their COMPS even after we listed the best 3 as Apple to Apple - though more than 1 mile BUT  within the same market bcos most COMPS considering SOLD properties around your subject property would be the same as those that needs renovation.

I’d love to meet up in the Burnsville/Apple Valley area.

It's important to spend the $40-100 for one month to review the data and be able to filter number of bedrooms and how many it accommodates for apples to apples. 2.

Very good tax climate, and landlord friendly combined with strong economic growth with tech companies like Apple and google building data centers, Tesla is building the semi-truck factory and a exodus from CA of people all point to strong signs of appreciation. 

Apples and oranges.

Analyzing a house hack like a traditional rental is not comparing apples to apples.Expecting a high CoC, cash flow, or even breaking even with today's interest rates will likely leave you on the sidelines.And unfortunately, I wouldn't be shocked when rates come down that prices will likely be quite a bit higher.

If I ran apples to apples illustrations and laid them side-by-side, there would only be very slight, company-specific differences.