Although I respectfully disagree, we both know this isn't the appropriate forum for a discussion on the application of the third prong of the test, or whether a local Judge would expand prong three to include situations in which, on reliance on advice that denotes an understanding of the law, a person acts on and is harmed by the advice of a lay person in another state who is not licensed in Virginia.

@Andre Cano, in order to properly harm your wallet, move to Manhattan...

No harm in taking a look and submitting your offer.

I have the perfect opportunity as I will have no debt, no burdening responsibilities, and can basically uproot without harm.

I meant to harm… I was just having a little fun…Hey, if it works for you… Sounds good to me!

These differences can include bedroom count, condition of property (hope that answers your question), upgrades, and square footage to name a few If you feel confident in your ARV, I see no harm in making an offer.

Etc.You need to protect yourself as the landlord from any liability should a tenant of your choosing (and not the choosing of the other tenants) cause damage or harm to another tenant. 

No harm coming in low as a starting point.

If they are disruptive, do harm or go against my reasonable rules, I can also evict them.  

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-18/yup-rent-control-does-more-harm-than-goodhttps://web.stanford.edu/~diamondr/DMQ.pdfstandford studyhttps://mises.org/library/unintended-consequences-rent-controlBombing and rent controlhttps://mises.org/wire/rent-control-makes-good-politics-and-bad-economicsGood politics bad economicsNYTimeshttp://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/30/opinion/how-rent-control-hurts-the-poor.html