The NJ deal had a usury cap on business loans of 50% so that was enforceable and within the legal limits, got the property back.

@Kyle M.You just hit the nail on the head!

@Ben Capone - if you self-manage, setting up a property management company to act as the public-facing entity is also part of a smart asset protection strategy.

It also eliminated “the cap on the amount of the fixed charge that the PUC may authorize.

I would nail down a city that you want to invest in and start developing your core 4.

I have been investing in residential real estate since 2012 first in California and then in Florida.My cash flow has been slowly and regularly increasing during the years thanks to the cap on property tax increase in these 2 States (IE proposition 13 in CA and 10% cap on investment properties in FL).Recently I started to analyze deals in Texas and Indiana for my next rental property.Reading some posts on this platform and talking to some investors, I quickly realized that, during the years, all the rent increases will be eaten up by the regular property tax reassessments.I think many investors often underestimate this issue.Am I missing anything?

I think Allen nailed it. 

That said, @Lorien Rollins has hers nailed down with minimal time input/wk 

@Chris Seveney hits the nail on the head, you don't need concrete "legal proof" to provide to a realtor when submitting such offers.

Now for all NON-NAR entities, MLS's, they'd be suicidal idiot's to continue the practice that NAR just lost suit at, because it's a slam-dunk suit to nail them for exact same thing given the now established precedent.