Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
3
Votes
Andrea G.
  • Rental Property Investor
3
Votes |
4
Posts

Why regular property tax reassessments are overlooked when underwriting a deal?

Andrea G.
  • Rental Property Investor
Posted

I have been investing in residential real estate since 2012 first in California and then in Florida.

My cash flow has been slowly and regularly increasing during the years thanks to the cap on property tax increase in these 2 States (IE proposition 13 in CA and 10% cap on investment properties in FL).

Recently I started to analyze deals in Texas and Indiana for my next rental property.

Reading some posts on this platform and talking to some investors, I quickly realized that, during the years, all the rent increases will be eaten up by the regular property tax reassessments.

I think many investors often underestimate this issue.

Am I missing anything?

Thanks!

Loading replies...