Tenants move out because they get (pointlessly) spooked by a new owner.  

But l am also really spooked living in Austin where we've been officially labeled the second most overvalued city in Texas by Forbes, et al.  

You mentioned letting the current tenant stay for a bit - that was my original plan when looking at this house, however the idea of getting into a situation of habitability complaints vs what could be painted as retaliatory eviction spooks me a bit.

Ultimately what you can possibly do is tell your tenant on the lease that gave notice that if the other person stays they will be on the hook for eviction costs, rent owed ,judgments, and wage garnishment.They need to get that person OUT before they leave the unit.No legal advice but if you spook them some they might leave on their own.

Who's to say that cutting the money supply back down won't spook investors and lead to a crash? 

My offer to the seller was a cash offer so bringing in mortgage documents to the closing might spook them.

The economic justice thing kinda spooks me, but the are a non-profit trying to make a difference.You can only own one property and you must live there and stay there as long as the NACA holds the mortgage.

We used to have several Israeli clients (although most have sold now) and have clients in Australia, Singapore, Ukraine, Canada, Dubai, and even more.

The buyers, with good reason, were spooked, and tried to re trade at $100,000. we declined, and they attempted to breach contract. but the buyers agent never collected an EMD, so after months of back and forth with a lawyer involved we are now stuck with a nice $8,000 legal bill and still no EMD or compensation for locking the house up for over 5 months. holding costs in upstate NY will make your stomach churn.... why does anyone live there?

If you ask him / her to write 1000 offers and 1 is accepted and you back out over being spooked by inspections, then, yeah it’s a waste of time.