I know there is a lot to be gained for doing the flipping yourself but DH and I struggle to find the time to put into them and I'm afraid the amount of time they'd spend vacant would do more harm than the improvement value.

I would like to say that putting properties under contract with no ability nor intention to close, then walking if not assigned, harms sellers.

So if they find a buyer before you, no harm no foul, except for the time you've spent.On a straight option contract as well as a flex option contract, most seasoned investors will use a clause that will allow them to backout of the contract in the event they are unable to wholesale.

However, bad tenants can not only keep you up at night, but can cause harm to your health and well being.

To be able to represent sellers (or buyers) in the marketing of their properties, one must go through an educational process and pass an exam attempting to insure that he has a certain basic level of knowledge so he will "do no harm' to the client he represents.

No harmful fumes.

Tenant shall ensure that the pet(s) shall not bite, injure or harm any individual or other pet(s), and shall not disturb others (neighbors or guests) or cause damage to the Dwelling Unit or the premises.

No harm coming in low as a starting point.

However, if the contract says that the bank is lending on property at, say, 50% LTC and they are getting an extra 2%ish on the interest payments because of the extra risk of not being able to pursue a deficiency judgment...then they are being compensated for the risk and I see no harm no foul.

These differences can include bedroom count, condition of property (hope that answers your question), upgrades, and square footage to name a few If you feel confident in your ARV, I see no harm in making an offer.