If it pans out the way you layed it out, sounds like a solid investment.

There can be a debate regarding the trends towards higher density buildings and if that is good or bad for society but I do not see anything immoral about it.I have lived abroad (Ecuador) and can second the idea that Karen Margrave brought up that the best building panning and practices are here in the US.

Some are pans, some are moving.

In a couple years it may pan out so I'd say its a bit of a gamble, I don't think the area will deteriorate/depreciate so you're safe in that regard.

If that doesn't pan out, then there's a good chance I'll buy it myself.The point of my post was to ask advice on the situation and how to best deal with the seller.

It also helps airflow in the home.Wrap your paint pans, rollers, brushes etc with kroger or walmart  sacks to keep paint fresh for the next day.

FX Concepts LLC later filed for bankruptcy.Today, I no longer search for what other hedge fund managers have to say or what Peter Schiff at Euro Pacific Capital has to say.

Cali can suck Pacific winds, the odd ball state.

It may not help to revise the question, and it may seem like a mild difference, but it the real underlying question really isn't about whether turnkeys perform, it's whether rent-ready properties with comparable projected cash flow pan out or not.If that makes sense.

Here is one example of how the costs and rebate of the efficiency upgrades panned out:1450 square foot house in Berkeley, CA.