Ive been in many residential transactions where there is 1 party being represented by an agent, and 1 unrepresented.

Corey, it well could be an issue with the regulators as they will see it as a requirement to make the loan and doing so opens the door to the issues I mentioned and perhaps more depending on state laws.Additionally, this may not be a subject to take up with most RE attorneys as financing conflicts are really not their bag, ask an attorney who represents banks or lenders.

I am purchasing a property in Ohio and since I am unrepresented by an agent I am debating having the listing agent represent me as well.What do you think are the pros and cons of purchasing a property with dual agency? 

I would reach out to your state representative and let them know that PG&E is attempting to overrule state law.

Just a trash environment with criminals including officials and representatives. 

A few days later the regional representative called me and offered me bulk discounts. 

I don't think he represents small MHP investors well with his anti POH rental positions and his often derogatory and demeaning views of MHP residents.  

Not sure I want to represent myself, although I understand many guys do.

Also, the websites of delinquent tax attorneys Linebarger Goggan Blair and Sampson, at http://www.lgbs.com, or Perdue Brandon Fielder Collins & Mott, atwww.pbfcm.com, contain lists of the properties set for tax sale by the taxing units they represent.

For a long time my feeling has been that the standard 50/50 split between broker representing seller and broker representing buyer was a mismatch in terms of value, work, and results.