data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ef78/0ef78ab61540b9fb64bf9565cbfae9d3972dffb0" alt=""
28 February 2024 | 7 replies
So, basically, if you're splitting hairs over ownership percentage, here's the deal: Your partner dropping $40k on materials means they've got 25% skin in the game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da510/da510a4fcdf560a32dd35df38a4474219c48c8f4" alt=""
27 February 2024 | 8 replies
Thank you all for your input definitely looks like there is more than one to skin this cat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9281f/9281f34a407238c680f16aba289cf107c42c2f75" alt=""
27 February 2024 | 1 reply
Longer term, we could add additional cabins to the property (as stated above) since the current owners are sending overnight business to hotels in the area that are 15+ mins away.Our situation:We have about ~45% equity in my home (appraised at $775K about 6 months ago; we made some improvements but to be conservative, let's say this is still a good estimate), I can cash in my 401K, and have RSUs from my company that I can use for the majority of the cash I need to have "skin in the game" but it's short the 20% I will need for an SBA 540 for the real estate + 5% for the SBA 7a (this 5% for the DP is possible if the sellers can finance some of the business).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf948/cf948962269ac7b093ea10c5e15c6a3579bcc0bf" alt=""
26 February 2024 | 4 replies
But most will shy away from little to no skin in the game in this market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5ea4/b5ea49366b7bdc826c964beb98dadc09a9d4786c" alt=""
26 February 2024 | 32 replies
You already know of this because you practice it, so I wouldn't let this one get under your skin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e02ba/e02ba37b6dd1856e74799733ca37350822a3442b" alt=""
25 February 2024 | 13 replies
Ideally, the Borrower would make a single payment like they are used to and my Investor has security based on the hypothecated Note.Or, must/should I have Investor in 1st position with a Security Instrument and Note based on agreed to terms and then create a Note Rider for a Wrap Loan between my LLC and Borrower spelling out those agreed to terms along with a 2nd Security Instrument in 2ndposition.Example:Borrower Pays: 12% and 3 PointsInvestor gets; 8% and 2 points (spelled out in a Note)LLC gets: 4% and 1 pointPerhaps there are a number of ways to skin this cat but I’m looking for a simple, yet protective, approach for both Investor and LLC.Thanks,Steve
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ee49/8ee49159ca7f9b000d7447d0a207d329bb89101d" alt=""
28 February 2024 | 130 replies
Even GP investment sometimes is not real investment if their skin of the game is coming from their parent or loan as well ( a LOT doing this).
24 February 2024 | 3 replies
No matter what, if this is your first investment property deal, you will have to have some "skin in the game" with anywhere from a 10% to 25% down payment, plus closing costs and required reserves.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fd2b/3fd2bd351443b51796716643c82dccbfdd9f74ea" alt=""
23 February 2024 | 26 replies
Usually, they want you to have skin in the game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c872/1c872fe7a287855823607082665dd368109960d0" alt=""
21 February 2024 | 7 replies
You're taking some of the risk or have skin in the game by handling 50% of the expenses.4.