
6 April 2015 | 6 replies
You could honestly go down 15% off of the ARV of a similarly valued piece of land in your area and what is the harm done?

9 December 2013 | 23 replies
Often if you have a valid reason for taking some action other than playing games, they'll likely buy it, depends on how good your initial reason was or is, especially if there is no harm and done well. :)

4 November 2015 | 13 replies
I do not know the legality behind not being able to change locks if the property has not been occupied, but do not see the harm in trying to secure your property in the meantime.

24 April 2019 | 19 replies
Needless to say the insurance was not renewed at the end of the year.Insurance companies rarely if ever pay out like you would assume that they should, and often do more harm then good as the very long delays in repairs causes significant stress on your tenants and strains your relationship with them.

8 February 2016 | 8 replies
What course of action would cause them the least amount of harm in the short/long term?

5 December 2013 | 12 replies
Unless the $50. is make-or-break then what's the harm?

25 March 2019 | 39 replies
You are liable for damages if that pet bites or harms someone on your property.

23 October 2018 | 8 replies
You have an obligation to prevent any further harm to your tenant, which might mean temporary housing, a complete lead test and depending on the results, professional remediation.Hopefully, your insurance will cover some of the costs, but even if it doesn't, you need to take this very seriously and act as quickly as possible.This link may help: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/lead-discl...

30 November 2021 | 66 replies
Lead safe implies there could still be lead paint, but it is encapsulated so the outer surface is not as harmful.

1 November 2017 | 3 replies
From the sound of it, title companies seem harmless and that they could not harm me but I still want to make sure I do the due diligence necessary.