I had the actual numbers in post several months back but this figure is close to what they touted when City Center opened.

It's the risk that is involved in being an investor purchasing sub to.If someone is actually touting the above scenario is an actual exit strategy, then that person has no business in this industry.

I see a comment on here touting "investors" who did a deal with an investor and lost their house in foreclosure. why?

Fields like medical bill coding (or IT, back in the '90s) are touted as the next big thing, people spend money on schooling, and then the jobs are gradually outsourced or filled with H1Bs instead.

So touting success stories of those who rode the bubble is no indication of the future. the realities of the "new" economy should in itself be an indication that cash flow investing should be even more desirable now, as appreciation will not be achievable in the way it was 5 years ago.

One brand has lower UL-rating but touts their manufacturer rating - compare based on UL-ratings only is what I'm getting at.

I wonder if the hedge fund is the same one that is touted to invest in the bulk REO deals that are being pitched by various fee-based REO guru sites on the web.

I didn't know lawyers were here to scare the sh*t out of us lol.

I almost despise my spreadsheet format that I use to track my deals, but this is the most highly touted method for managing deals in the pipeline.

If she is getting 17 to 1 letters against the Health Bill and still touts the Health Bill, she is the one who doesn't get it.