It sounds attractive because everyone says it is low- or no-money down, but if you don't have money to make the deal another way, you don't have much leverage to make the deal the way you are suggesting.Sub to and seller finance are shiny objects for people who want to get started in investing to make money, but have no capital.

Counter the objection to you earning income on finding them a secondary buyer in advance, not later when the deal fails because you withheld information or lied.

However, clarifying the long-term business objectives/strategy is key before finalizing your entity set-up.

One is not necessarily better than the other, and your preference will likely depend on your objectives for the home.For example, if this is a short-term investment property on which you are looking to maximize the annual income and depreciate the value for tax purposes, you may prefer a manager who will keep your home filled to maximum occupancy.On the other hand, if this is a long term investment or even where you plan to retire, you will likely want to find someone very different.7.

Remember, no system is perfect, so avoid the temptation of constantly chasing after the next shiny object.

A common objection I hear when speaking to sellers is that they'd love to sell to me subject to but it will affect their DTI when they go to buy a new house.

Especially or handling objections. 

Of course they won't do it on their own...you have to object to it if objections are allowed by your contract. 

It is another landlord that is leaving the sharp objects.

So you have to balance out options with your short term / long term objectives / need for the cash.