But I do not see that this has anything to do with the Safe Act or Dodd/Frank.

Whether that stems from incompetence, lack of education or malicious intent, take your pic, all those guys were at the party.So fast forward to 2013, those broker jokers are still in the market.

It is most likely providing basic perils coverage (think fire) but can be endorsed to include other perils (theft, vandalism & malicious mischief are 2 I recommend).

Sean,In my area that would be referred to as a "rooming house" and there are specific bylaws at the municipal level governing them: they can only be in certain areas and require a zoning designation / permit to allow occupancy that exceeds another local bylaw limiting the number of "boarders" in a single dwelling to three.As far as rental laws, check with your state's Residential Tenancies Act (or equivalent).

Hi Ethan - Wow you look like those amazing good looking male model turned actors of Hollywood.

Other people could cost you money but it's more likely due to incompetence rather than malicious intent.That said, there's certainly nothing at all wrong with being careful, dotting your I's and crossing your T's so to speak.

The only saving grace is that the tenants are actually nice and respectful and I don't think would do anything malicious but I am stuck with these leases until March when they are up. 3.

How do you handle a potential fraudulent actor?

He was never allowed to touch real estate investing again under SEC rules for being a bad actor, because of that one little white lie.In real estate, your credibility, truthfulness, and trust, is everything.

The above conduct constituted 930 violations of R.C. 4735.02, which provides that no person, partnership, association, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or corporation shall advertise, act or assume to act as a real estate broker or real estate salesperson, without first being licensed under R.C.