So the actual value in the law is slim (in my opinion).Just my thoughts and thanks for posting it!

This is not an Arizona specific forum, the chances of somebody knowing the exact answer you need are slim.

Even if you do the chances of them beating you in court will be slim since you'll obviously have counterclaims for your breach of lease, damage to property, etc.

If it is a requirement for every showing, the tenant demand might be really slim.

This may seem like a tough pill to swallow, and it is, but it will be less stressful and much cheaper than the eviction process, trust me.2) if they refuse to leave after being offered the money contact an EXPERIENCED eviction attorney who charges a FLAT FEE for the eviction.

Chances are slim you'll win anything and it's an expensive process.

However, getting a loan is a very slim option for me, because I am not currently employed in a very high paying job.

Given a hypothetical scenario with 70% debt funding, you are looking at fairly slim gross rental yield of +/- 10% on capital invested (ROI) - contingent on an unlikely 0% vacancy.

I am thinking to have row house in canton and insurance shall be taken into consideration and if it is high, and make sense, it might eat the slim cash flow and even would make it negative.Anyone having any issue having those row houses?

Starting with slim margins is better than getting scared off from getting any margins at all.I also think I'd be a bit less hesitant to go with small providers if I intended to invest nearby.