If you are a smaller check writer, it’s still important to conduct adequate diligence on the deal and the GP but there shouldn’t be any alarm signals going off solely related to the investment minimums. 

That said the alternative is probably okay: you get rid of the litigious tenants and re-sign all the others to a closer to market rent.

Bankruptcy filings, liens, or other defaults on properties could signal cash flow issues.

I'm getting mixed signals about paying pts from lenders and I'm genuinely interested in hearing some of the logic behind which is best for this loan that we are about to do.

Here’s an example of bonus depreciation.Here are some of the current trends that are highlighting the importance of a cost segregation study.Contract Logistics Expansion: Experiencing growth in contract logistic divisions leading to outsourced warehousing and distribution activities.Warehouse Technology Advancements: Integration of AI, robotics and IoT allows for operational efficiencies including reduced labor costs and improved safety.Warehouse Automation Growth: Significant growth signals a need for efficiencies and the adoption of new technology.Warehouse Space Expansion: There are ongoing developments in the warehouse space to help support the growing demand for infrastructure and warehouse space.Robotics and AI investments: There is a demand for faster throughput and immediate fulfillment which is causing investors to invest more into AI and robotics.Cost segregation becomes an even more critical tax strategy as there is an increase in investments in automation and technology as it frees up cash by creating additional tax savings.Some of the financial benefits that a warehouse investor can expect from a cost segregation study include:An increase in cash flow for automationImmediate tax savingsEnhanced warehouse property valueImproved warehouse ROI by reducing tax liabilities and increasing cash flow.There are many items that can be reclassified for accelerated depreciation through the use of a cost segregation study.

Back to back bad reviews signals something is really out of whack, or there's always the possibility that it is your competition trying to undermine your business. 

I have heard mixed signals on this, but it seems that some lenders are allowing them now.

Conversely, if I'm only seeing properties fail the 1% rule in a given area, it's probably a good signal to look elsewhere unless a particularly good deal pops up. 

Quit the virtue signaling, it's as cringe as the columbus cartel. 

Are there any red flags that immediately signal a deal might not be worth pursuing, even if the numbers seem solid?