I imagine the mortgage has provisions that enable the lender to pursue any of the named parties in the event of a default, in addition to the property itself being on the hook.I believe that if the seller can pay off the mortgage loan, it doesn't matter how many names are on the mortgage.

This is a long term buy and hold plan to diversify further and help set up "early retirement" and enable us to focus more on entrepreneurial endeavors and less on my "day job".  

I now live in part and rent out the other, enabling the other side to cover my mortgage.  

I figured the capital I could generate wholesaling properties and commission from real estate sales would potentially enable me to acquire some great rental deals i've found.

Removing people with good paying jobs that enable them to keep their properties up can't be good.I hope it doesn't pass, but I think it will.

When I gradauated from college about 4 years ago, my wife and I bough an inexpensive house that enabled us to have a garage and a yard for less than rent would cost in an apartment where we would be willing to live.

Since I would have someone helping me out with the mortgage through rent this will also enable me to save a lot more money than I am now which I can reinvest in future buy-and-hold's and also the improvements on the property.

If my business partner and I find a property in DC zone as RF-1, which enables a single family home conversion into two condo units as a matter of right. 

I just wanted to share that KNOWLEDGE is POWER and that BP has brought me value and has enabled me to bring value to others.

That does not mean I would increase it by that much every year, but it would at least enable me to do so.Something tells me that this would not be legal though.