data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/444fc/444fcf065f5724d522730885de595cfea43ba901" alt=""
16 October 2024 | 5 replies
**Community Investment Program (CIP)**: Some local banks or financial institutions partner with government programs to provide low-interest loans or better lending terms for landlords who participate in affordable housing programs like Section 8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e60c/6e60c2886d1594f09db3bf950df385296703374e" alt=""
15 October 2024 | 8 replies
They never took foodstamps or government aid.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44dd6/44dd635b6337a5511e8d6dc0e5157516e62fc8f9" alt=""
13 October 2024 | 5 replies
I realize that, if true, this is governed by state law rather than federal statutes, and therefore there will be fifty different answers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72c9a/72c9af39559c72e1b1ac4d4ba738819663557708" alt=""
15 October 2024 | 40 replies
However, if you are worried about being sued, you should use the best level of protection that you can afford.Your state laws: The laws governing asset protection vary from state to state.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2c03/f2c03d19ceff4b98714d54251f6d7cd001452405" alt=""
13 October 2024 | 5 replies
I also highly recommend going with a section 8 government guaranteed rental property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9682b/9682be029804bf9d127d883a8df2dfb1b563e821" alt=""
14 October 2024 | 8 replies
Yes, the government pays the Section 8 rent timely, but more and more tenants are having to pay a portion of their rent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f692/2f6924d641f6875027cf6bb71c0e74b76e082c77" alt=""
12 October 2024 | 25 replies
However, all non-government jobs have a finite lifespan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45d38/45d381355910608386ac8f1870035dd008f50d9f" alt=""
12 October 2024 | 8 replies
By day, I work in the government sector at Los Alamos National Laboratory, but I’m passionate about building my real estate portfolio.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9784c/9784c5baf10784ab85e230094e33b843d814ae5e" alt=""
11 October 2024 | 2 replies
Assembly Bill 1771, also known as the California Housing Speculation Act, aims to change real estate tax policy to discourage investors from quickly reselling properties like single-family homes.Under the proposed bill, an additional 25% tax would be imposed on the gain from the sale of a qualified asset (including homes) within three years of the previous sale.The tax reduction is dependent on the number of years passed since the initial purchase of the qualified asset, ranging from a 20% reduction for sales occurring between 3.01 to 4 years to a 100% reduction for sales occurring more than seven years after the initial purchase.The revenues generated by this tax increase would be deposited into the Speculation Recapture Community Reinvestment Fund, which aims to support affordable housing, local governments, schools, and infrastructure projects.The bill is introduced by Assembly Member Ward, and the proposed tax changes would take effect from January 1, 2023.Assembly Member Ward argues that short-term investors in the market, including fix and flip investors, contribute to rising housing prices, limiting opportunities for Californians to purchase homes.While the bill may discourage short-term speculative transactions, it is worth noting that California's tax laws still provide certain advantages for investors, including unlimited tax write-offs and depreciation benefits.The bill is subject to legislative approval, and Assembly Member Ward will speak publicly about the bill at the San Diego County Administration Center on a specified date.Please note that this is a simplified summary of the bill and its potential impact on fix and flip investors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20e2d/20e2dfb1f7b8c238fe1790d29a35286d96e97048" alt=""
11 October 2024 | 12 replies
As a side note, Floridas current insurance issues are mostly caused by other factors besides the increase in severity and frequency of natural disasters however (roofing scams and no caps on lawyers fees for claims, both results of bad government policy that resulted in most insurance companies leaving the state and the remaining ones raising rates to account for having to pay for all of the roofing scams and absurdly high attorney fees on simple claims).